Predictive modelling for the optimization of Cr(VI)-free electroplating processes

The transition from Cr(VI)-based electroplating, with its high corrosion resistance and compelling decorative properties, to Cr(VI)-free alternatives is driven by the toxic nature of Cr(VI) and associated environmental risks. Cr(III)-based solutions, while promising, fall short of the performance of Cr(VI) coatings. Predictive modeling has proven to be an important tool for evaluating and optimizing Cr(VI)-free electroplating processes. By simulating plating scenarios, parameters such as plating thickness, uniformity and process efficiency are evaluated, reducing the need for extensive experimental trials.

Alternatives to hard chrome plating

For decades, hard chrome plating has been a staple in numerous commercial industries, including military, aerospace, aircraft, drilling equipment and printing, for both manufacturing and maintenance purposes. This widespread use is due to its ability to achieve virtually unlimited deposit thickness, as well as its excellent corrosion and wear resistant properties [1-3]. However, increasing efforts are being made in the finishing industry to find alternatives to hexavalent hard chrome plating. Manufacturers and metal finishing companies are increasingly using nickel and nickel alloys as substitutes for hard chrome in various plating applications. Nickel's slow oxidation rate provides excellent corrosion resistance, which is essential for various manufacturing requirements. In addition, its strong adhesion to other metals makes it suitable for both undercoats and topcoats. Notable nickel-based alternatives include nickel-tungsten alloys [4], which offer excellent heat resistance, hardness and corrosion resistance and are characterized by cost-effective and efficient plating times. These alloys are non-toxic and extremely versatile. Another option is electroless nickel [6], which is known for its ability to provide uniform, corrosion-resistant coatings without electrical current, making it ideal for complex components such as molds, gears, medical devices and aircraft parts. Nickel-based alternatives are as good or better than hard chrome while meeting environmental requirements. Other alternatives include innovative electroplating methods such as pulse electroplating of nanophase Co-P [7], Ni-W [8], Co composites with chromium carbide or SiC [9] and thermal HVOF spraying, a dry plating technology for tungsten carbide used in aircraft landing gear, hydraulic actuators and MRO [10]. These advances are driving the shift towards sustainable, efficient and high-performance solutions.

Alternatives to decorative Cr(VI) coatings

The interest in decorative coatings with trivalent chromium baths is based on key chemical differences:

Cr(VI⁾⁺ + 6 ^e- → Cr metal (hexavalent chromium)

Cr(III⁾⁺ + 3 ^e- → Cr metal (trivalent chromium)

Trivalent chromium requires only half of the electrons for the reduction, which offers an efficiency of 2:1 compared to hexavalent chromium. While hexavalent chromium only achieves an efficiency of 10-15% due to side reactions, up to 30% is possible with trivalent chromium, which represents a significant advance in the industry. Switching to trivalent chromium plating for decorative applications offers numerous advantages. It doubles production capacity through tighter part allocation, although the capacity of nickel baths can still limit production. The process eliminates the need for lead anodes, reducing health risks and simplifying reporting requirements. With a lower Cr(III) content (7.5-22.5 g/L) compared to Cr(VI) baths (75-128 g/L), rinsing becomes easier and waste generation is significantly reduced. The resulting deposits are easier to remove and recoat while providing better adhesion. Contaminants can be removed from the bath by selective cleaning, unlike hexavalent baths which require extensive cleaning. The process produces less gas, eliminates corrosive mists and uses wetting agents to ensure uniform deposits. Problems such as shading, whitening and burning of deposits are also avoided. Rack handling is optimized to resemble the simplicity of nickel baths, and waste treatment is simplified by the alkaline precipitation of Cr(III) hydroxide. The process also enables the development of barrel plating systems with trivalent chromium.

The industry benefits significantly from trivalent chromium plating due to its numerous advantages. It is a safer alternative as trivalent chromium is less toxic and offers better protection for workers and the environment. It ensures compliance with stricter regulations for the use of hexavalent chromium and offers performance comparable to or better than conventional methods in terms of corrosion and mechanical properties. However, the transition to trivalent chromium plating requires significant adjustments. Modifications to the plating line, such as new baths, rinsing routines, cooling systems and special waste water treatment, increase both complexity and cost. Operating costs also increase due to higher chemical costs, higher scrap rates, more intensive bath maintenance (14 hours per week compared to 2 hours for Cr(VI)) and higher recovery costs caused by issues such as color inconsistencies. Operational concerns include plating speed, as chloride-based Cr(III) baths operate twice as fast as sulfate-based baths, which is critical for return plating lines. The type of anode also varies, with chloride-based baths using long-life graphite anodes and sulphate-based baths using more expensive mixed metal oxide (MMO) anodes that require regular recoating. In addition, there are technical challenges in meeting requirements and customer wishes. To overcome these challenges, predictive modeling using computer-aided simulations has proven effective in optimizing plating processes, reducing costly trials and saving time by predicting performance prior to production.

Electroplating and digital technologies

Electroplating can be significantly improved through the integration of digital technologies. Here are the main ways in which digital methods can improve Cr(VI)-free electroplating: digital twins, Internet of Things and Artificial Intelligence.

Digital twins [11,12]

Predictive modeling in electroplating processes uses advanced computational methods to predict outcomes and optimize various parameters involved in the electroplating process. Traditional optimization techniques are often based on empirical approaches and are time consuming. In contrast, predictive modeling uses mathematical models, machine learning algorithms and simulations to predict key factors such as coating thickness, uniformity and surface quality based on input variables associated with the plating process configuration. This data set enables the creation of a digital twin model, a virtual representation of the actual plating line that includes the specific electrolyte, plating line setup, process parameters and geometric features of the parts to be plated (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1: Insights into the input data required to create a digital twin model of the coating process and the expected outcomes of the simulation results [11,12]

The electrochemical performance of the electrolyte is critical to the quality and efficiency of the electroplating process. It is evaluated in the laboratory using techniques such as chronoamperometry or chronopotentiometry to collect polarization data. This data shows the electrochemical behavior of the plating bath with a specific substrate, taking into account process parameters such as metal ion concentration, pH, temperature, agitation and additives. The focus on electrochemical analysis ensures optimum bath conditions for consistent, high-quality plating results. Knowledge of the electrochemical behaviour of the plating bath offers several key advantages for the electroplating process. It plays a crucial role in quality control, as the composition and concentration of the bath has a direct impact on the quality of the deposited coating. Electrochemical analysis helps to monitor metal ion concentration, additives and other components, ensuring consistent, high-quality coatings. In addition, understanding electrochemical behavior enables optimization of process parameters, resulting in improved deposition rates, more uniform coating and better control over thickness and structure. This in turn increases cost efficiency by minimizing the consumption of expensive chemicals and reducing waste. Electrochemical analysis also helps with environmental compliance by ensuring that the bath operates within safe limits and contributes to environmental compliance. In addition, continuous monitoring of the electrochemical properties of the bath can extend its life, avoiding premature wear and costly downtime for complete bath replacement. Finally, electrochemical analysis serves as a valuable tool for troubleshooting and maintenance, as deviations from normal parameters can indicate problems such as contamination or equipment malfunction, allowing for timely corrective action. These analyses are crucial for the development of alternatives to Cr(VI) plating, as the electrochemical behavior of new formulations is still largely unknown.

However, this is only the first step, as the complexity of the process ranges from laboratory experiments and prototypes to large industrial baths. The electroplating infrastructure is crucial for high-quality results, with the most important factors being the bath design, the stirring system and the electrode arrangement. Effective agitation ensures uniform electrolyte composition and temperature, prevents defects and ensures uniform deposition.

The plating rack is equally important as it secures the parts, ensures proper electrical connections, prevents defects and facilitates handling. A well-designed rack improves electrolyte flow and plating efficiency, and therefore the quality of the final coating. Selecting the appropriate current density or voltage program is critical to effective electroplating operations as it directly affects plating quality, deposition rate and process efficiency. The correct setting will ensure a uniform and high quality coating by controlling the deposition rate of metal ions and avoiding problems such as uneven thickness or poor adhesion. The right parameters minimize defects such as pitting, rough surfaces, poor adhesion and burning in chrome deposits, resulting in smooth, defect-free coatings. In addition, an optimized current density or voltage improves efficiency by reducing energy and resource waste while ensuring a uniform coating on all substrate surfaces. These settings also stabilize the electrolyte and prevent unwanted side reactions that could affect coating quality. In addition, selecting the right parameters ensures compliance with industry standards and specifications and meets the specific requirements of different applications and materials.

The electroplating process is inherently complex and requires careful optimization of numerous factors to achieve consistent, high-quality results. This complexity increases further as new techniques such as Cr(III)-based plating solutions are developed or deployed on a larger scale.

Predictive modeling with Digital Twin technology addresses these challenges by simulating process setups and coating baths, enabling rapid evaluation of current and planned processes. These models provide insights into the current density, voltage distribution and thickness of the metal layer on the coated surfaces (Fig. 1) while enabling efficient evaluation of coating bath performance and electrochemical properties. In contrast to small-scale tests, digital twins can be scaled directly to industrial baths. For example, Figure 2 shows simulations of a production-scale bath with a specific rack arrangement, comparing three plating bath conditions: a Cr(VI)-based solution, a Cr(III)-based solution with low agitation, and a Cr(III)-based solution with high agitation (from left to right).

The simulation results, shown on a color-coded map, show variations in layer thickness, with red indicating overplated areas and dark blue indicating underplated areas. Visualizing these distributions on a 3D model of the parts highlights the uniformity of the coating, with a legend providing both qualitative and quantitative data on coating thickness or current density/voltage distribution. Figure 2 shows performance differences between Cr(VI)- and Cr(III)-based solutions. Cr(VI) deposits cover more surface area, but exhibit greater thickness variation and risk of overplating (red areas).

Fig. 2: Analysis of the platability of Cr(VI)- and Cr(III)-based solutions, with different colors representing different thicknesses of chromium deposits [11]

Cr(III) deposits also show overplating with strong agitation, but with less thickness than Cr(VI), while low agitation results in moderate thickness but leaves some underplated areas (dark blue). This analysis evaluates the plating quality, uniformity and performance of the equipment and establishes a basis for identifying improvements. Insights from simulations, such as platability analysis, guide optimization efforts to achieve better process performance and high-quality deposits (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3: Workflow for implementing mitigation strategies using predictive modeling approaches [11]

Optimization iterations include dry runs using the original digital twin model to explore process variables, including improved parameters, part layouts and polarization data. Specialized tooling plays a key role in achieving optimal coating quality for complex parts by ensuring proper positioning, reliable electrical contact and uniform electrolyte exposure. Customized tools can improve electrolyte flow, reduce defects and eliminate over- or under-coating in specific areas by targeting areas with different current densities. In addition, tools help to test different plating conditions, improve efficiency, reduce contamination and ensure consistency throughout production.

Tooling design plays a critical role in optimizing the electroplating of complex parts by ensuring consistent plating quality and addressing challenges related to part geometry and process performance. However, developing specialized tooling can be costly, especially if the final design does not meet expectations after manufacturing. To avoid this, predictive modeling can be used to evaluate tooling concepts at the design stage and identify and resolve potential issues before production begins. In Cr(III) electroplating, auxiliary anodes are considered key components to improve the distribution of electrical current and promote deposit growth. These anodes contribute to a uniform current density, reduce over or under plating and improve electrolyte distribution, especially for complex parts. They also reduce bath polarization, facilitate better electrolyte movement, extend primary anode life and minimize localized corrosion. Through strategic placement, auxiliary anodes optimize process parameters, improve process control and ensure a more uniform coating. The use of predictive models in evaluating the performance of auxiliary anodes simplifies process configuration and optimizes the electroplating of high-quality chrome coatings, especially for complicated components.

Internet of Things (IoT) [13]

The Internet of Things is revolutionizing electroplating by introducing advanced connectivity, real-time monitoring and automation. IoT-enabled sensors can track critical parameters such as temperature, pH, voltage, current density and chemical composition during the electroplating process, ensuring consistency and quality by instantly detecting and correcting deviations. IoT devices can also enable predictive maintenance by monitoring the condition of equipment such as plating baths, pumps, anodes and stirring systems and detecting early signs of wear or failure to reduce downtime and extend equipment life. In addition, IoT systems are able to continuously provide data on plating efficiency, plating uniformity and bath conditions, enabling precise process optimization that minimizes waste and ensures optimal results (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4: The structure of the automation system using IoT technology [13]

The Internet of Things can also connect electroplating processes with inventory and supply chain management systems, optimizing the replenishment of resources and improving operational efficiency. In addition, it enables full traceability of the plating process by logging detailed data for each part and batch, improving quality control, regulatory compliance and certification efforts. Finally, the Internet of Things can also contribute to energy efficiency by optimizing plating parameters in real time, reducing energy consumption and making the process more environmentally friendly and cost-effective. By transforming electroplating into a data-driven and highly reactive system, the Internet of Things can increase process productivity, improve quality and reduce operating costs.

Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) [14-16]

The electroplating industry is also being transformed by artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML), which enable smarter, data-driven decision making and improved efficiency. AI and ML enable manufacturers to optimize plating parameters, predict maintenance needs, ensure consistent quality and reduce costs while improving sustainability. By analyzing extensive data sets, AI can identify patterns and optimize key variables such as temperature, current density and bath composition to ensure uniform coating thickness and coverage of the surfaces being coated. Predictive maintenance is also greatly improved as machine learning models can monitor sensor data to detect potential problems early, preventing unexpected downtime and saving costs. In addition to operational efficiency, the integration of AI into the Internet of Things enables the creation of digital twin models that can be used to simulate and optimize electroplating processes in real time. This enables virtual testing and data-driven decisions to be made before changes are made to production lines.

Final thoughts

The integration of predictive modeling, digital twins, IoT and AI in the development of Cr(VI)-free electroplating processes offers significant advances in both process performance and sustainability. By enabling accurate simulations, real-time monitoring and data-driven decision making, these technologies can optimize plating efficiency, uniformity and quality while reducing environmental impact and operating costs. Predictive models and digital twins enable fine-tuning of process parameters, including bath composition and part positioning, ensuring consistent results and mitigating issues related to over- or under-coating. The use of the Internet of Things (IoT) further enhances this by enabling real-time monitoring and predictive maintenance, improving system reliability and reducing downtime. AI and machine learning offer the potential to continuously improve process efficiency by analyzing vast amounts of data and predicting potential disruptions before they occur. Overall, these technologies pave the way for a safer, more efficient and environmentally friendly future in the electroplating industry and facilitate the transition to Cr(VI)-free alternatives while maintaining high quality standards.

The transition from Cr(VI) to Cr(III) will also be the focus of the workshop "Electroplating in transition: Cr3 in focus - practice, innovation and regulation"
from 31.3.-1.4.2025 at the fem in Schwäbisch Gmünd. Registration + info: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Literature
[1] Raj L.M.I., Sathishkumar J., Kumaragurubaran B., Gopal P., International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology 2 (2013) 5, pp. 427-432.
[2] Hasanah I.U., Priadi D., Dhaneswara D., Journal of Materials Exploration and Findings 2 (2023) 2, pp. 81-90.
[3] Dhinakaran V., Jagadeesha T., Materials Today Proceedings 26 (2021) 19, pp. 9176-9179.
[4] Costa J.M., de Almeida Neto A.F., Ultrasonic Sonochemistry 73 (2021) 105495 pp. 1-7.
[5] Rao H., Li W., Zhao F., Song Y., Liu H., Zhu L., Chen H., Molecules 28 (2023) 8, pp. 1-11.
[6] Tay S.L., Jadhav P., Goode Ch., Key Engineering Materials 893 (2021), pp. 105-110.
[7] Tóth-Kádár E., Bakonyi I., Pogány L., Cziráki A., Surface and Coatings Technology 88 (1997) 1-3, pp. 57-65.
[8] Allahyarzadeh M.H., Aliofkhazraei M., Rezvanian A.R., Torabinejad V., Sabour Rouhaghdam A.R., Surface and Coatings Technology 3017 (2016) 15, pp. 978-1010.
[9] Guo X., Si X., Liu Y., Zhao W., Wang X., Li Ch., Qi J., Cao J., Journal of the European Ceramic Society 42 (2022) 14, pp. 6435-6444.
[10] Islam S., Hasan J., Poroma P., Akter S., Journal of Science and Engineering Papers 1 (2024) 1, pp. 31-39.
[11] Franczak A., Using predictive modeling to evaluate the performance of Cr(VI)-free electroplating process, Jahrbuch Oberflächentechnik 2024, Eugen G. Leuze Verlag, pp. 1-11.
[12] Franczak A., Die Digitalisierung von Kupfergalvanisierungsprozessen in Leiterplattenanwendungen, Jahrbuch Oberflächentechnik 2024, Eugen G. Leuze Verlag, pp. 277-287.
[13] Zakeri A., Venkateshaiah N., Burnham K., Iliev O., Proceedings of Researchfora, 19th International Conference, Goa, India, April 28th-29th, 2018, pp. 15-22.
[14] Katirci R., Irem Danaci K., Journal of Applied Electrochemistry 53 (2023), pp. 2077-2089.
[15] Sun Y., Teck Tan Y., Zhao Y., Zhi Hao Teo A., Zhou Y., Kee Seng Wong J., The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 135 (2024), pp. 4715-4730.
[16] Oliviera L.M.L., Toniolo J.C., Revista Faculdades do Saber 9 (2024) 23, pp. 465-475.