Industry 4.0 in electroplating technology

Industry 4.0 in electroplating technology

Digitalization also offers great potential in electroplating technology. In particular, the use of accumulated data to improve electrolyte management, predictive system maintenance or quality improvement represents an exciting field of application. The article provides an overview of the opportunities and obstacles to the introduction of Industry 4.0, explains frequently used terms and introduces the topic of data acquisition, data analysis and simulation. Finally, the first SME-compatible solutions for the digital transformation in electroplating technology are presented using practical examples from projects at the Fraunhofer IPA, the IFF at the University of Stuttgart and the IWF at the TU Braunschweig.

1 Introduction

The digitalization of industry is now internationally referred to as Industry 4.0. Its origins can be traced back to a future-oriented project launched in 2011 as part of the German government's high-tech strategy [1]. A central component of this is cyber-physical systems that link physical production processes with data from the cyber environment. Industry 4.0 is therefore not only having a decisive impact on production processes, but many business models are also being increasingly questioned or further developed in the context of digitalization [16].

The aim of Industry 4.0 is to create a high level of benefit for production companies by intelligently networking systems and processes. Information and communication technology methods and tools are used for this purpose. Intelligent networking can be used, for example, to increase the flexibility of production, to use data more efficiently (e.g. for predictive maintenance) or to increase resource efficiency [1].
 
The implementation of Industry 4.0 in electroplating technology is particularly challenging due to the high level of complexity resulting from the combination of process-oriented and discrete manufacturing. However, the newly emerging tools and methods are increasingly making it possible to better manage this complexity and therefore have particularly high potential for the industry. The introduction of Industry 4.0 offers electroplating technology great potential in the areas of process optimization, the handling of order processes, the development of new business models and employee development [18].
 
A basic prerequisite for being able to turn to new subject areas is the factors of time and resources. Most surface technology companies, and electroplating companies in particular, have between 30 and 100 employees. With companies of this size, it is often not possible to devote the necessary capacity to the challenging tasks of digital transformation. In addition, there are still no ready-made, comprehensive solutions for the introduction of Industry 4.0 tools and methods for electroplating [3].
In a survey of plasma technology companies, 60% of respondents rated Industry 4.0 as very important. The digital documentation of orders, networking within production and the monitoring of production processes were named as particularly important aspects [6]. The importance of these topics can be transferred to electroplating technology, where a successful introduction can also have positive effects in terms of improved product quality, higher productivity and therefore increased profitability. A generally valid assessment of the potential is not possible due to the large number of different coating processes, system types and company structures. This also leads to the challenges that arise when introducing Industry 4.0 to electroplating technology.

The production of electroplated surfaces requires the interaction of a large number of influencing variables, ranging from the system technology and peripherals (e.g. pumps, exhaust air, media supply) to the interacting chemical (inorganic and organic components, degradation products, pH value) and physical (temperature, current density, current form) coating parameters. The number of players involved in the creation of the coatings is similarly large. The coating system consists of tanks, possibly trolleys, rectifiers, peripherals such as pumps and ventilation technology. Depending on the component manufacturer, there may be different interfaces. In addition, there is the electrolyte, which is usually purchased from a process supplier. The coating company is therefore faced with the major task of networking the large number of individual systems and components with each other and with its own systems and devices in order to exploit the above-mentioned potential.

Obstacles on the way to implementation can also be derived from the considerations of plasma technology. These are the factors of time, high complexity and the necessary investment costs with a benefit that is usually unclear in absolute terms [6]. This cost-benefit conflict can be countered by developing general implementation concepts, preparing the content of the subject area and providing specific project examples.

2 Cyber-physical production systems for electroplating technology

Industrie 4 0 Abb 1Fig. 1: Cyber-physical production system as a core element of Industry 4.0 (based on [20])Cyber-physical production systems (CPPS) are a core element of Industry 4.0 and enable the coupling of physical elements with virtual elements of a production system. Figure 1 outlines the structure of such a system using the example of electroplating technology. Specifically, systems and machines can be coupled with simulation or data-based model environments, for example. Data acquisition systems ensure the coupling from the physical to the virtual environment and control signals and/or decision support for the physical environment can be derived from the virtual environment [20].

CPPS have great potential for electroplating technology in particular, as they allow the high complexity (combination of discrete and process-oriented production) of the processes to be better controlled. Mapping the production system in a model environment enables a much better understanding of the system and new approaches to improving productivity can be achieved. In particular, these approaches can support the improvement of energy and resource efficiency, robustness and the adaptability of processes [18].

2.1 Physical system: electroplating plant

Electroplating is a very diversified industry. The spectrum of parts ranges from the smallest parts in the millimeter range and below to products weighing several tons with a length of 10 m and more. The coating systems are just as variable (from decorative and functional targets to special applications such as electroforming and toolmaking) and so are the production techniques (manufactory, electroplating machine, roll-to-roll, etc.) and companies (contract electroplating, in-house production, system supplier). It is therefore difficult to define a general status for "the" electroplating technology.

Manual production is common for large parts, special applications and low-volume parts. The most commonly used type of system for larger quantities is currently certainly the automatic electroplating machine in conjunction with racks or drums. The racks/drums are attached to product carriers and are handled automatically within the system. The loading and unloading of the product carriers or racks/drums is carried out manually or via automation, whereby the proportion of automated loading is tending to increase, but is still far from being used as standard across the board. A system is a collection of containers for the electrolytes, which are connected via a transport system. It has all the equipment directly required for operation (e.g. sensors on containers, heating/cooling, pumps/filters, rectifiers, etc.), which are switched by a higher-level control system.

2.2 Data acquisition

Industrie 4 0 Abb 2Fig. 2: Current communication structure in the factory [14]In production companies, data is generated at various points, which can serve as the basis for CPPS. The automation pyramid in Figure 2 provides an overview of the various systems for recording data in production companies, starting with the specific recording of system statuses using sensors and extending to company-wide data recording in the ERP. The data volumes and resolutions recorded differ depending on the level.
 
Currently, different standards are usually used for communication between the individual levels, which can make the consistent integration of CPPS more difficult. The manufacturer- and platform-independent communication standard OPC Unified Architecture (OPC UA) [15] enables smoother communication between all levels and simplifies the consistent implementation of CPPS in companies.
 
Data is primarily collected for purposes in this context (e.g. temperature to control heating/cooling), and the sensors for the systems are selected with priority accordingly. The different components from different manufacturers, combined with the individualized design of the systems, result in a wide range of variants. Data exchange is usually manageable and is mostly limited to the functionally necessary aspects. Mainly quality and documentation-relevant parameters are recorded (traceability), but this is handled very differently and is often limited to logging or filing the log files. In most cases, there is no further processing or even automated evaluation of this data.
 
In addition to system control, data is also generated in upstream, downstream and accompanying areas. These include, in particular, process control and chemical analysis, logistics data and quality control (e.g. measurement of coating thickness and alloy composition). Due to different interfaces, there is often a patchwork of different systems and scattered data with only excerpts being recorded centrally.

2.3 Decision support and control systems

The overall control of an electroplating plant is usually carried out via a central programmable logic controller (PLC) in combination with a PC-based visualization as a human-machine interface (MMS or HMI). The PLC can take over the control and regulation of components directly or, in the case of devices, units or peripheral systems (e.g. exhaust air), control them with its own systems via signals and commands and process any data reported back.
 
There are major differences in the control and regulation of the individual functions in terms of optimization and complexity. For example, the transport processes are calculated using algorithms and, if necessary, optimized in order to generate a high throughput of goods. Other functions are controlled by continuous monitoring by sensors (temperature, fill level, pH value, etc.). Some conditions, especially chemical parameters, are usually not monitored continuously, but at certain intervals. In these cases, an intervention is carried out either only once on the basis of these control results, at fixed intervals or, if finer control is required, on the basis of determinable control data. A well-known example of this type of control is the ampere-hour-based dosing of electrolyte additives. The disadvantage of this control data is the limited consideration of real processes, as the actions are based on specifications (determined from long-term empirical values or average values) and the actual product mix may deviate from this.

2.4 Cyber system: smart data and big data

The virtual cyber system, often referred to as a digital twin, is a digital representation of the physical system. For this purpose, model-based and data-based approaches are essentially pursued, which are presented in more detail below.

2.4.1 Smart data: model-based approaches

In model-based approaches, the production system is mapped in a computing environment using physical/chemical models. This requires extensive process knowledge in order to be able to map the process in full. The advantage of this approach is that usually only a small amount of specific data from the physical system is required and the data acquisition effort can be minimized.
 
Model-based approaches are usually implemented in the form of a simulation, which in the context of production systems is defined in accordance with VDI standard 3633 [19] as the "simulation of a system with its dynamic processes in an experimentable model in order to gain knowledge that can be transferred to reality; in particular, the processes are developed over time" (VDI 3633 [19]).
 
The advantages of a simulation of production systems, consisting of process and process chain simulation, are that non-existent systems can be examined and real, existing systems can be examined without interfering with operation. For electroplating technology, this makes it possible to investigate different plant and electrolyte operating modes without directly intervening in the physical system. This leads to the next advantage, the possibility to test different optimization strategies with a minimum of effort by simply changing the parameters of the model. This makes it possible to constantly scrutinize the current strategy during operation and, if necessary, to adjust the parameters in the real process after a successful test in the simulation (VDI 3633 [19]) [8].
 
In general, simulations can be divided into static and dynamic simulations. Static approaches do not take time into account, whereas dynamic approaches take the dimension of time into account and therefore allow parameters to be adjusted during the runtime of the model. Furthermore, the simulation approaches can be divided into stochastic and deterministic approaches. Stochastic models contain random variables so that fluctuations occur during the execution of individual simulation runs. Typically, the random variable is statistically distributed around an average value. Deterministic simulations do not include random variables and the output is always the same [8].

Furthermore, simulations can be divided into discrete and continuous systems. In discrete systems, the variables only change at certain points in time, while continuous simulations allow the mapping of temporal changes [2]. An example of a discrete manufacturing system is a production line in which incoming parts at a machine change the state of the model (part hung in product carrier). Continuous systems can be process systems in which, for example, a chemical is consumed. Rates of change in such a system can be described by differential equations or difference equations.

Programs for simulating production systems are available for a wide range of applications. Plant Simulation from Siemens AG is widely used in discrete manufacturing and offers many options for connecting to other systems. The software Anylogic from The AnyLogic Company, which also enables the simulation of systems beyond production, can be used more universally.

2.4.2 Big data: data-based approaches

Data-based approaches are now a widely used process for evaluating large data sets. Initially, this was primarily used for the evaluation of internet searches, social networks and financial markets. Current developments in Industry 4.0 mean that these approaches are increasingly being used in industrial production.

The CRoss-Industry Standard Process for Data Mining (CRISP-DM) is an established process for data mining [17]. The individual phases can be seen in Figure 3. A fundamental component of this process is to depict the data in a model and use it to identify links and correlations in the data. For this purpose, statistical methods are systematically applied to large data sets [5].

Advanced machine learning makes use of data mining methods, among others. This in turn is divided into the areas of supervised learning and unsupervised learning. The aim of supervised learning is to develop a model that can provide predictions for input data for which no data set exists. Well-known examples of supervised learning are artificial neural networks (ANN) and decision trees. For the area of unsupervised learning, kMeans is a well-known algorithm. The aim of unsupervised learning is to find patterns and links in a given data set. kMeans, for example, attempts to assign all data sets to a group (cluster). The number of groups to be searched for must be specified in advance [10].

Algorithms for machine learning are now available in proprietary and non-proprietary software and programming languages and are well integrated. Software such as KNIME offers a good overview of the evaluation with its GUI. For continuous evaluation and real-time applications, however, programming languages such as C/C++, Python, R or Java are preferable.

The models of the cyber system should be used to positively influence the physical system. To this end, control signals can be derived directly from the cyber system or a visualization can be used to influence employees in their decisions.

3 Application examples - How Industry 4.0 can work in electroplating technology

Industrie 4 0 Abb 3Fig. 3: Phases of the CRISP-DM reference model [17]In the following, an already implemented and a planned project in the field of I4.0 will be presented.

Electroplating 4.0 - Benefits of a digital twin of an electroplating plant

The Galvanik 4.0 project, which was funded by the BMWi in the form of a ZIM cooperation project, aimed to improve the process stability of a zinc-nickel process for barrel plating. The galvanic deposition of alloy layers is complex, as the deposition of two or more metals significantly increases the number of process parameters and electrolyte components to be controlled.
 
The development approach pursued was to digitally map the consumption of the electrolyte components by means of material balancing. The Institute for Machine Tools and Production Engineering IWF at TU Braunschweig set up a digital twin of the electroplating plant of the project partner involved. Furthermore, a digital image of the electrolyte was created together with the Institute of Industrial Manufacturing and Factory Operation IFF in cooperation with the Fraunhofer IPA [11, 13]. By entering consumption parameters, this simulation model offers the possibility of mapping states of the real production plant independently of time and without intervention in the production process and deriving process-improving interventions from this.

The challenge here was to represent the model of the system and the electrolyte as accurately as possible so that deviations between the real system and the model are as small as possible. The determining factor for the consumption parameters in a drum coating system is primarily the carry-over through the drum and components. In cooperation with the contract coating company, the components to be coated were divided into carry-over categories after prior empirical measurement, which were then stored in the ERP system.

A decisive factor for the successful implementation and use of the simulation model was the subsequent integration of real order data from the MES into the digital image in order to be able to track the change in the electrolyte due to the real coating processes.

Compared to the usual consumption control via ampere hours, which assumes an average value of the carryover in relation to the coated area, this results in significant deviations between the two operating modes, especially in the case of accumulations of individual component types. During the validation of the algorithms, the simulation model was able to achieve a mathematical accuracy of the concentration of an electrolyte component over the course of a month with an average deviation of 2.8 % from the chemically analyzed concentration.

The digital image of the coating system and the electrolyte with its specific consumption parameters, in combination with the real application data, enables the calculated determination of electrolyte concentrations. This is of particular interest with regard to electrolyte components that are difficult to determine or can only be determined irregularly. A digital twin of the electrolyte can be used in future to improve process stability, achieve tighter tolerances and thus save costs for chemicals. Going one step further, the development of a digital twin of the electrolyte can be used to develop a system for predictive electrolyte maintenance. This approach is to be developed as part of a planned research project.

Industrie 4 0 Abb 4Fig. 4: Course of the simulated and analytically determined concentration [13]

Predictive maintenance in electroplating technology

Maintenance includes all technical and administrative measures to maintain the functional condition of a unit under consideration and to restore it in the event of a failure [7]. In operational practice, maintenance plays a very important role due to high costs and downtimes. With regard to economic factors, inadequate maintenance measures can lead to losses in production capacity of up to 20 % [9]. In a survey of experts, around 80 % of respondents therefore confirmed that maintenance is of high and increasing importance [12].

Maintenance can be divided into three strategies. Reactive, damage-dependent maintenance, preventive and predictive maintenance and predictive maintenance. The idea behind predictive maintenance is not to wait for a possible failure, but to predict such a condition on the basis of data acquisition. Within maintenance, the task of servicing is to maintain the target condition of a system or machine [9].
 
The collection of data, the networking of systems and the analysis of this data, as pursued in the course of the introduction of Industry 4.0, opens up new possibilities with regard to predictive maintenance. This applies in particular to the electroplating industry, where the challenge is that, compared to a machine tool, an electroplating system consists of individual components from different manufacturers. The electrolyte, which is usually purchased from a process supplier, also requires continuous monitoring. Standardized concepts for networking and data exchange, which could be used for predictive maintenance of electrolyte and system and thus for a stable coating process without unnecessary downtime, do not currently exist in electroplating technology.

As part of a planned research project, an interdisciplinary team from industry and science is tackling this challenge in order to simplify the maintenance process of the system and electrolyte and thus increase system and electrolyte availability. With the help of simulation and big data approaches, the project aims to enable the plant operator or a service partner to take predictive maintenance measures in line with requirements. From a process engineering perspective, the concept of electrolyte management in particular is to be further developed with the help of simulation and data evaluation. An important part of this is also the investigation of which sensors and data acquisition are actually necessary, as a large amount of data is often collected but neither centrally recorded nor analyzed and evaluated. The development of suitable models and algorithms should enable predictive maintenance of electrolyte and system technology, so that in future a mode of operation with narrower tolerance limits can be established with a higher capacity and, above all, with the shortest possible downtimes.

4 Summary

The aim of Industry 4.0 is to improve the productivity, flexibility and quality of production processes and to create opportunities for new business models through the intelligent networking of systems and processes. Electroplating technology is faced with the difficult task of meeting the challenges of digital transformation in the face of limited personnel capacity, unknown investment costs and the question of 'where to start'.

The IWF at TU Braunschweig and Fraunhofer IPA are working with various SMEs from the electroplating industry to develop useful and practicable solutions for electroplating that can be used to take the first steps towards implementing Industry 4.0. The current focus is on the beneficial use of data that is already being generated.

In a publicly funded project, a digital image of the system was used to create approaches that can be used to improve electrolyte management. In a further project, solutions for predictive maintenance in electroplating plants are to be developed so that electroplating technology can also benefit from the potential savings resulting from shorter downtimes and higher productivity.
 

Literature

[1] BMBF: Industry 4.0, 2019, available at: https://www.bmbf.de/de/zukunftsprojekt-industrie-4-0-848.html Accessed on: 01.07.2019
[2] Borshchev, A.; Filippov, A.: From System Dynamics and Discrete Event to Practical Agent Based Modeling: Reasons, Techniques, Tools, Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference of the System Dynamics Society, 2004
[3] Deutsche Messe AG: Aller Anfang ist schwer, JOT Journal für Oberflächentechnik 59, 3, 2019, 70-71, DOI: 10.1007/s35144-019-0024-6
[4] Fallenbeck, N.; Eckert, C.: IT-Sicherheit und Cloud Computing, in: Vogel-Heuser, B.; Bauernhansl, T.; Hompel, M. ten (eds.): Handbuch Industrie 4.0. 2nd edition, Springer Vieweg, Berlin, 2017, 137-171, DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-53254-6_8
[5] Fayyad, U.; Piatetsky-Shapiro, G.; Padhraic S., From Data Mining to Knowledge Discovery in Databases, AI Magazine 17, 3, 1996, 37-54
[6] Ferse, K.; Awakowicz, P.; Beck, U.; Brand, C.; Engelstädter, J.P.; Fiedler, W.; Foest, R.; Kersten, H.; Lemmer, O.; Schäfer, H.-J.; Schwock, A.: Plasma Technology 4.0. Vacuum in Research and Practice 30, 6, 2018, 34-39, DOI: 10.1002/vipr.201800697
[7] Standard DIN 31051 2012 DIN 31051:2012, Fundamentals of maintenance
[8] Harrell, C.R.; Djonov, V.; Fellabaum, C.; Volarevic, V.: Risks of Using Sterilization by Gamma Radiation: The Other Side of the Coin. International journal of medical sciences 15, 3, 2018, 274-279, DOI: 10.7150/ijms.22644
[9] Huber, M.: Case Study: Predictive Maintenance, in: Haneke, U.; Trahasch, S.; Zimmer, M.; Felden, C. (eds.): Data Science, dpunkt, Heidelberg, 2018, 225-244
[10] James, G.; Witten, D.; Hastie, T.; Tibshirani, R.: An introduction to statistical learning: With applications in R., Corrected at 8th printing, Springer texts in statistics, Springer, New York, Heidelberg, Dordrecht, London, 2017
[11] Kölle, S.; Mock, C., Schmid, K.; Beatriz dos Santos, C.: From Industry 4.0 to Electroplating 4.1 - Electrolyte management rethought, Womag, 4, 2019, available at: www.womag-online.de
[12] Kuhn, A.; Schuh, G.; Stahl, B.: Nachhaltige Instandhaltung: Trends, Potenziale und Handlungsfelder nachhaltiger Instandhaltung, Report on the results of the BMBF-funded study on sustainable maintenance, VDMA-Verl., Frankfurt a.M., 2006
[13] Leiden, A.; Thiede, S.,; Herrmann, C.: From Industry 4.0 to Electroplating 4.1 - Cyber-physical production systems for the electroplating process chain, Womag, 12, 2018, available at: www.womag-online.de
[14] Neef, B.; Plank, M.; Posselt, G.; Thiede, S.; Herrmann, C.: Demand-oriented Selection and Combination of Industrial Bus Systems for Advanced Energy Management Purposes, Procedia CIRP 48, 2016, 224-229, DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2016.04.090
[15] OPC Foundation, Unified Architecture, 2019, available at: https://opcfoundation.org/about/opc-technologies/opc-ua/, accessed on 11.07.2019
[16] Reinhart, G.: Handbuch Industrie 4.0: Geschäftsmodelle, Prozesse, Technik, Hanser, Munich, 2017, available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.3139/9783446449893DOI: 10.3139/9783446449893
[17] Shearer, C.: The CRISP-DM Model: The New Blueprint for Data Mining, 4, 5, 2000, 13-22, available at: https://mineracaodedados.files.wordpress.com/2012/04/the-crisp-dm-model-the-new-blueprint-for-data-mining-shearer-colin.pdf
[18] Sievers, U.: From Industry 4.0 to Electroplating 4.1 - Potential and practical implementation of the Industry 4.0 concept in electroplating, Womag, 11, 2018, 1-2
[19] VDI 3633:2014, Simulation of logistics, material flow and production systems
[20] Thiede, S.; Juraschek, M.; Herrmann, C.: Implementing Cyber-physical Production Systems in Learning Factories, Procedia CIRP 54, 2016, 7-12, DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2016.04.098
 
  • Issue: Januar
  • Year: 2020
Image

Eugen G. Leuze Verlag GmbH & Co. KG
Karlstraße 4
88348 Bad Saulgau

Tel.: 07581 4801-0
Fax: 07581 4801-10
E-Mail: info@leuze-verlag.de

 

Melden Sie sich jetzt an unserem Newsletter an: